1
|
| Pakistan |
This article is part of the series: |
|
|
|
Executive
Legislative
Judiciary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issues |
|
Other countries · Atlas Politics Portal |
The Supreme Court (Urdu: عدالت عظمیٰ ) is the apex court in Pakistan\'s judicial hierarchy, the final arbiter of legal and constitutional disputes. The Court\'s permanent seat is Islamabad. The Court has a number of de jure powers which are outlined in the Constitution of Pakistan. Through several periods of military rule and constitutional suspensions, the court has also established itself as a de facto check on military power.
Contents |
Part VII, chapter 2 of the Constitution (articles 176 through 191) deals with the powers, composition, rules, and responsibilities of the Supreme Court. Here is a summary:
In addition to the above, the Constitution makes numerous references to the Supreme Court in other chapters and sections. An important function of the judiciary branch is to provide checks and balances to the power of the other branches of government. The Supreme Court under Pervaiz Musharaff took oath not on the constitution of Pakistan but on a Legal Framework Order made by the military.
The Supreme Court has the explicit, de jure power to block the exercise of certain Presidential reserve powers. For example, under Article 58, the President may dismiss the National Assembly (triggering new elections) but the dismissal is subject to Supreme Court approval. The Court also has the power to overturn presidential orders and parliamentary legislation by declaring such orders or laws to be unconstitutional.
Another example: article 17 of the Constitution states:
Every citizen, not being in the service of Pakistan, shall have the right to form or be a member of a political party, subject to any reasonable restrictions imposed by law in the interest of the sovereignty or integrity of Pakistan and such law shall provide that where the Federal Government declare that any political party has been formed or is operating in a manner prejudicial to the sovereignty or integrity of Pakistan, the Federal Government shall, within fifteen days of such declaration, refer the matter to the Supreme Court whose decision on such reference shall be final.
The Supreme Court thus provides, in principle, an important safeguard against the abuse of laws that have the potential to have politically repressive consequences.
The de jure powers of the court as outlined in the Constitution must be seen in the context of Pakistani political history during which the army has seized power, declared martial law and suspended the constitution. Despite the military interventions in the government, the court has maintained its institutional integrity and has been able in some degree to maintain its authority in the face of military rule.
The Court has the strong support of the people and the elite and is one of the more respected institutions in the nation. Even during military rule, when the Court might have been expected to be subject to a supra-constitutional dispensation, it has managed to use its institutional authority to maintain some influence over political events.
For example, shortly after the government of General Pervez Musharraf came to power by a coup, the opposition challenged the legitimacy of the coup, asking the court to rule on its legality Military takeover challenged in court; BBC, Nov 22 1999. On May 12, 2000 the Court rendered a nuanced verdict Pakistan court limits army rule, and -
Although the government, before this judgement, had not given a timetable for the restoration of democracy - having argued that it needed an indefinite and possibly prolonged time to reform the country - Musharraf publicly submitted to the Courts judgement [1]. The elections were duly held in October 2002 as ordered and the Constitution was revived.
Pakistani legal theorists have posited that Pakistan\'s grundnorm, the basis for its Constitutional convention and system of laws, continues in effect (and the Supreme Court therefore retains its authority) even when the written constitution is suspended by the imposition of a military dictablanda.
|
|
This article or section needs to be updated. Please update the article to reflect recent events, and remove this template when finished. |
Until November 3 2007, the Chief Justice and other Judges of the Supreme Court were:
Immediately following the oath by Dogar, the Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry was removed from the Supreme Court and arrested by the troops belonging to the 111 brigade of Pakistan Army sent by President Musharraf.
Currently the Supreme Court of Pakistan consists of the following who took an oath to President Musharraff. These judges are all illegal as they violated the Order of the Supreme Court that made all of Musharraff\'s actions illegal:
Justice Abdul Hameed Doogar took the oath of Chief Justice, even after a 7-member Supreme Court Bench, including Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, nullified the imposition of emergency, suspension of constitution, and Provisional Constitutional Order, instructing all the honourable judges not to take oath under the PCO, and all military personnel not to obey any "illegal" orders.golden-historic-decision-by-supreme-court-of-pakistan/ Order of the Supreme Court of Pakistan November 3, 2007.
According to The Times, the Judges of the Supreme Court of Pakistan who had pleged allegiance to General Pervez Musharaff have been caught in sexual acts with prostitutes. The article alleges that the photographs of the judges in sexual acts were used to blackmail the judges to take the oath of allegiance and make rulings that the military wants.Sex Scandal involving Supreme Court Judges. Ghulam Hasnain, reporting from Islamabad for The Times, November 11, 2007, accessed November 21, 2007.
Chief Justice Chaudhry was then arrested by Pakistan Army along with the seven Justices who had refused to take an oath of allegiance to President Musharaff.
Now, four more judges have taken oath to the PCO. These four judges are not from the existing roaster of judges on November 03, 2007.
On 9th March 2007, a presidential reference was served to the Chief Justice, Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, attempting effectively to suspend him. The government ordered him to go on compulsory leave. On July 20, 2007, the Supreme Court unanimously overturned the compulsory leave order, and by a ten-out-of-thirteen majority, also ordered Chaudhry reinstated as Chief Justice.
The court ruled that the PO 27 of 1970 is unconstitutional. This order takes away the power of the executive to suspend Judges.Text of Supreme Court Order
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia